Purchase Article
Account Credit $18.50
Article Cost $0.40
Balance of Credit $18.10
Confirm

The cost of your purchase will exceed your credit of . Click here to be taken to your account to purchase more credit.

Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

LIMITED TIME OFFER: Receive 10% off your first credit purchase (Example: Buy a $10 credit but get billed for only $9)!

Advanced Search
Law as Politics, Politics as Law
Back
September 21, 2017
Inroads Journal
President Donald Trump with Neil and Marie Louise Gorsuch 

(Word Count: 3,300)

It isn’t easy keeping either of America’s big coalitions together. In the opening months of the Trump administration, Republicans divided over foreign policy (neoconservative hegemonists vs. Jacksonian isolationists), trade policy (traditional Republican business interests and libertarians vs. Trumpian protectionists), immigration (ditto), health care (everybody against the Ryan plan) and, it now seems, even taxes. The Democratic Party was better able to unify around opposing Trump and the Republican desire to repeal Obamacare, but the division between its social-democratic and neoliberal wings – exposed by the surprisingly effective primary challenge of Bernie Sanders – reemerged in the struggle for Democratic National Committee chair between Keith Ellison and Tom Perez. The Trump era looks set to realign the partisan and ideological system that has characterized American politics for the last half-century.

But one issue was an exception. The nomination of the mild-mannered Neil Gorsuch as junior justice of the U.S. Supreme Court united each party internally and totally polarized them against each other. The U.S. Senate – long a bulwark of individualism and cross-party back-scratching, with at least ten Republican members who have publicly feuded with President Trump – divided almost perfectly on party lines. The minority Democrats took the politically risky step of filibustering a nominee whose professional qualifications were difficult to question. And then the majority Republicans took the equally perilous step of rewriting the body’s rules to eliminate the ability of a minority to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee (the so-called “nuclear option”).


Purchase article to read more - $1.49
Prev
Top Selling Articles
/
View All
Next
Alternatives Journal | Apr 22, 2017

Dave Cormier talks about Multiple Open Online Courses.

 
Alternatives Journal | Jun 6, 2017

Apparently, Canadian PMs cannot suggest the oil industry needs to be phased out.

Inroads Journal | Sep 21, 2017

Neil Gorsuch and the future of the U.S. Supreme Court

 
Alternatives Journal | Apr 22, 2017

You are neither too young, too old, too rich nor too poor to take an open online course.

 
Inroads Journal | Sep 21, 2017

Hearing echoes of populisms past

Green Teacher | Apr 28, 2016

A place-based education program that could bring hands-on discovery into K-5 classrooms in your community.

 
Green Teacher | Jul 5, 2016

Finding the hidden stories in the places we live

 
Alternatives Journal | Apr 2, 2017

The Suzuki Elders are up for the fight, ready for battle.

 
Green Teacher | Jul 5, 2016

High school students experience deep learning while creating a food truck that shows movies 

 
Green Teacher | Jun 19, 2017

High school students modify one personal action to help the environment

 
Green Teacher | Jul 5, 2016

An exploration in the Amazon gives teachers deeper global and local connections

 
Green Teacher | Mar 24, 2017

FOR LUCY SPRAGUE MITCHELL, the founder of Bank Street College in New York City, education was larger than the school building and greater than the book.