Purchase Article
Account Credit $18.50
Article Cost $0.40
Balance of Credit $18.10
Confirm

The cost of your purchase will exceed your credit of . Click here to be taken to your account to purchase more credit.

Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

LIMITED TIME OFFER: Receive 10% off your first credit purchase (Example: Buy a $10 credit but get billed for only $9)!

Advanced Search
Law as Politics, Politics as Law
Back
September 21, 2017
Inroads Journal
President Donald Trump with Neil and Marie Louise Gorsuch 

(Word Count: 3,300)

It isn’t easy keeping either of America’s big coalitions together. In the opening months of the Trump administration, Republicans divided over foreign policy (neoconservative hegemonists vs. Jacksonian isolationists), trade policy (traditional Republican business interests and libertarians vs. Trumpian protectionists), immigration (ditto), health care (everybody against the Ryan plan) and, it now seems, even taxes. The Democratic Party was better able to unify around opposing Trump and the Republican desire to repeal Obamacare, but the division between its social-democratic and neoliberal wings – exposed by the surprisingly effective primary challenge of Bernie Sanders – reemerged in the struggle for Democratic National Committee chair between Keith Ellison and Tom Perez. The Trump era looks set to realign the partisan and ideological system that has characterized American politics for the last half-century.

But one issue was an exception. The nomination of the mild-mannered Neil Gorsuch as junior justice of the U.S. Supreme Court united each party internally and totally polarized them against each other. The U.S. Senate – long a bulwark of individualism and cross-party back-scratching, with at least ten Republican members who have publicly feuded with President Trump – divided almost perfectly on party lines. The minority Democrats took the politically risky step of filibustering a nominee whose professional qualifications were difficult to question. And then the majority Republicans took the equally perilous step of rewriting the body’s rules to eliminate the ability of a minority to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee (the so-called “nuclear option”).


Purchase article to read more - $1.49
Prev
Top Selling Articles
/
View All
Next
EcoParent | Oct 15, 2013

Kat Kelly Hayduk explains cohousing and what made her move to a cohousing community

 
Inroads Journal | Mar 15, 2017

A serious approach to climate change requires real policies, not aspirational goals

 
Green Teacher | Apr 28, 2016

Use sailing to teach water ecology and environmental stewardship 

 
Inroads Journal | Nov 19, 2017

Paradoxical election outcome in times of economic prosperity and its implications for Czech democracy and European politics.

 
Green Teacher | Jan 20, 2017

How can students explore new and creative ways of portraying diverse ecosystems, particularly regarding places that most people will never see?

 
Green Teacher | Feb 13, 2018

A rationale, practical suggestions and activities for enriching learning with young learners

 
Green Teacher | Feb 13, 2018

How you can get your students to eat healthy fruit and chocolate while changing the world

 
Alternatives Journal | Jun 6, 2017

Apparently, Canadian PMs cannot suggest the oil industry needs to be phased out.

Alternatives Journal | Jun 15, 2017

How farm runoff threatens Lake Erie with unending algal blooms.

EcoParent | Jul 15, 2016

How Outward Bound transforms and how its students see the world.

 
Alternatives Journal | Sep 1, 2016

The Trudeau and Notley governments have changed the politics and possibility of Canada’s climate and energy challenge.

Alternatives Journal | Apr 3, 2017

The first thing I did was change my perspective